LOVE BEGETS LOVE

By the Editor In Chief

With the epitome of the dawn of the new millennium—by n’ large—almost every soul saw in the mind’s eye that in the wake of covet for amity and loathing towards skirmish—people around the globe—explicitly the big power(s) would opt for a circuit—which would evaporate all odds of a nightmarish scenario by espousing a pragmatic mindset. That the trillions of hefty sum—stemming from the cherished exchequers’—now being splurged on the callous acquisition of cataclysmic sort arsenal—would end at once to bring peace, progress n’ prosperity for domains—all around—as in most of the environs, guiltless populace is in hunt for a loaf of bread—not to talk of butter for their survival— as their bona fide birth right. Paradoxically their dream for an affluent way of life could not be translated into a reality—perceptibly—due to agonistic outlook of ‘the men who rule the world’ today—with duress—in a way, as the masters of each ones’ destiny. Not only that the clear-cut mandates of the United Nations are being blatantly flouted day-after-day, a pandemonium-like setting is being—simultaneously—glued, as a tarmac for a scenario identical to a Pandora’s Box for the generations to come—irrespective of their colour, cast, creed or credo. Is it an apposite way for the global opulence? If not why the milieus are not being averted by eschewing lust for hegemony n’ egotism—by applying a nosy yardstick—based on out-and-out equilibrium? Why a reign of horror, revulsion n’ nausea is being cheered by astute living-beings? Such a frame of mind is not only a full-size admonishes for the world—specifically—the civilized one but also a pointer of a luckless time ahead. The big powers’ itchiness should now reckon as it stands quiescent in the folios of history—which shall visibly never rejuvenate. Via a down-to-earth loom, a fact which comes into sight is that there is now—literally—only one super power—called the United States, which is copiously skilled to ward off every perilous course—wherever it persists because of the cantankerous posture of some warlords, ruling varied locales in almost all dimensions of the globe. Isn’t it obligatory for the big power to put such sadistic n’ atrocious rulers like Israel n’ India to bend before the ground realities by settling disputes with others—essentially with the neighbours through unruffled means with a judicious viewpoint as a pedestal for such a course? The fact can not be neglected that such an unflappable notion can be made doable vis-à-vis every issue—currently posing threats to the peace—in every region—may it be Iraq, North Korea, Palestine, Chechnya or Kashmir—provided Washington plumps for a straightforward intent? No one can rebuff the factuality that US—if goes for a lasting peace the world over—the pushy problematic state of affairs, overcastting the horizons in miscellaneous areas with risks of illogical n’ irrational feuds shall vanish in a jiffy. Instead of taking over the world body, it—as a big brother—a pretender of human rights is ought to switch its full-scale energies for instantaneous solution of the longed issues—by setting aside the un-finished agenda of Bush, the Senior—which had eventually proved fruitless. Such a stance—if repeated—would result into nothing except mortification—especially for a dazzling nation like the United States. Its crusade against terrorism—in all forms and manifestations—may protract unabated, yet it must acknowledge that every state is crowned with ‘sovereignty’—an elementary icon, without which no one can live with dignity n’ honour. With this perception, it is mandatory for the United States to trail the policy of ‘live and let others’ live—irrespective of their size n’ belief. Nonetheless it must come out—in a zestful way—to resolve the issues of Palestine and Kashmir—where hundreds of thousand vulnerable civilians are being targeted with inhuman atrocities—day n’ night—at the behest of Zionist lobbies—the Israelis n’ Indians—solely for raising their legitimate voice—the right of self-determination to affix their destiny, as enshrined in the UN Charter as well as pledged through the spirited resolutions of the world-body—which—ironically remain unimplemented and contemptuous so far. Isn’t it a slur for the UN—which came into being for global peace rather than giving a boost to conflicts? At the same time what would—in the long run—the super power conquer by incapacitating Iraq [just for the sake of Tel Aviv’s sanctuary and to fortify its ferocious motives against Muslims] as well as gratuitous surveillance on North Korea’s suspected nuke sites? Two years of the 21st century have gone with a spell of panic and the third one has surfaced. Wouldn’t it be apt for the Anglo-US flipside United Nations to advocate a composed n’ sagacious view of the objective realities by taking firm steps to avoid all sorts of conflagrations—which would ultimately—go in no ones’ interest and instead would upshot into nothing tangible except jeopardising the universal fate. Let it be couched by Washington –in unequivocal stipulations—that it too will not escape the awful bang of war—wherever it erupts and whatever its magnitude may be in any spot of the orb. Its equally indispensable for the US Congress to ponder over the insinuation of war analytically rather than falling prey to Bush administration’s rhetoric about the ostensible intimidation—being directed towards the United States and its ‘friends-cum-allies’ by any one—as rest assured no one can—in any manner—dare do so due to the lofty stature of ‘the de facto master’ of the current era. Every one anticipates that with the advent of the New Year, President Bush would—expectantly—alter his precedence for taking this planet towards synchronization for certifying the pre-eminence of that United States in all perspectives, which can help usher in an epoch of magnificence n’ splendour—all around by getting into the process of an amiable communiqué with everyone via brisk solution of all the hazardous topics—with the Kashmir dispute atop to establish the fact that the erudite dominions like America—truthfully love peace n’ hate all sorts of mêlée—in whatever fashion they exist even in a petite corner around the world. Such a gesture from insightful societies specifically from the United States and Britain is not too elusive to be expected and one can hope—with a sense of sureness that with an amicable approach they will initiate a venture for peace and harmony to achieve the cherished goals of ameliorating the lot of the mankind in a swift way instead of getting onto a craze for enormous outflow of their national wealth on futile trends of rolling with the race for accumulating acerbic weaponry – posing a terrorization to humanity, which—by all norms of conviviality--is in dire need of a fabulous kismet wherever it dwells.

Print this Article

Copyright © 2002 The World Today (TWTNews.Net). All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Editor-in-Chief: MUMTAZ HAMID RAO

THE WORLD TODAY NEWS NET

www.TWTNews.Net